Private Intelligence Report
We scanned acquisition.com, its three managing partners, and one portfolio company across 5 AI engines. 53 checks per entity. Here is where you stand.
Scorecard
Your personal site leads the leadership group. That is not accidental. It reflects how you build.
Portfolio Company
enchanted-fairies.com
Only entity in the Cited tier.
CEO
sharran.com
Weakest: Local and Review Presence (33%)
Chairwoman
leilahormozi.com
Weakest: Schema and Authority (56%)
Holding Company
acquisition.com
Weakest: Schema and Authority (25%)
Founder
alexhormozi.com
Weakest: Content / Social / Schema (25%)
Pillar Comparison
Leadership sites and holding company compared across 7 pillars.
| Pillar | Sharran | Leila | ACQ | Alex |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical Foundation | 80% | 72% | 94% | 56% |
| Search Readiness | 79% | 71% | 93% | 43% |
| AI Discoverability | 93% | 79% | 71% | 93% |
| Content Signals | 67% | 83% | 33% | 25% |
| Social and Sharing | 100% | 100% | 100% | 25% |
| Schema and Authority | 56% | 56% | 25% | 25% |
| Local and Review | 33% | 58% | 33% | 33% |
Enchanted Fairies (81, Cited) not shown. Pillar breakdown available on request.
Key Findings
Finding 01
The most recognized name in the organization has one of the weakest AI profiles. Content Signals, Social, and Schema all at 25%. His brand carries enormous weight in traditional media and social. AI engines cannot properly structure or cite his expertise because the technical signals are missing.
Finding 02
AI engines see 456 pages but have no structured data to understand who you are, what you do, or why you matter. A massive building with no signage. Every AI engine is guessing instead of reading.
Finding 03
This is the pillar that determines whether AI engines treat you as a source or just a mention. acquisition.com and alexhormozi.com both score 25%. No JSON-LD. No FAQ schema. No entity disambiguation linking the three managing partners to the holding company. AI engines have no structured way to understand that Sharran, Leila, and Alex are one organization.
Finding 04
The only entity in the highest-performance tier is a portfolio company, not a managing partner or the holding company itself. Enchanted Fairies scores 81. The AI visibility gap is concentrated at the leadership and brand level, not the portfolio level.
Finding 05
When queried in isolation, Grok identifies Sharran Srivatsaa as "founder and CEO of Trellis, a real estate technology company." Not CEO of Acquisition.com. His own site's metadata still lists a previous role at Srilo Ventures. Two of the five engines are writing his biography wrong, in two different ways. This is what happens when structured identity data is not updated after a major leadership transition.
Citation Scorecard
Every engine knows who you are. Fewer point users to your actual domain. That gap is the opportunity.
| Entity | Recognition | Domain Citation | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGP | GEM | PPX | GRK | CLD | CGP | GEM | PPX | GRK | CLD | |
| Acquisition.com | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Alex Hormozi | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — | — | — | — | — |
| Leila Hormozi | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Sharran Srivatsaa | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Scores verified April 9, 2026. Domain citation retested across all 5 engines April 13, 2026 using neutral, uniform prompts. CGP = ChatGPT, GEM = Gemini, PPX = Perplexity, GRK = Grok, CLD = Claude. Recognition = engine knows the entity exists. Domain citation = engine cited the entity's actual website in its response. Citation results vary by model version and query date.
Benchmark Comparison
Your real world authority is unquestioned. Your AI visibility sits below the broad benchmark average and below four of the five PE firms we have scanned. The gap is concentrated in Schema and Authority and Local Presence, the two pillars that determine whether AI engines cite you or just mention you.
The Cost of Waiting
AI engines cannot connect your leadership to your holding company.
There is no structured data linking Sharran, Leila, and Alex to acquisition.com as a single entity. No sameAs properties. No @id references. No organization schema. When AI engines answer questions about your team, they are assembling the answer from fragments across the web instead of reading a structured declaration of who you are.
Every day without structured data, AI engines answer questions about acquisition.com with incomplete information.
When someone asks ChatGPT "what does acquisition.com do," the answer is assembled from whatever signals exist. Right now those signals include zero JSON-LD, no llms.txt, and no entity disambiguation linking your leadership team to the holding company.
AI search is growing 30%+ year over year. The gap between your real world authority and your AI visibility is widening, not closing.
ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok, and Claude answer hundreds of millions of queries daily. The signals measured in this report determine who gets cited and who gets left out. Your "AI first" initiative needs a measurement layer. This is it.
The Machine
Seven pillars plus citation testing. Technical foundation, search readiness, AI discoverability, content signals, social and sharing, schema and authority, local presence. Every check is weighted and scored algorithmically.
ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok, and Claude. Each engine is queried with uniform, name inclusive prompts and corrected for query bias. Structural audit and real time citation testing in a single pass.
25 entities across 6 holding companies benchmarked before this report was written. Your scores are measured against real portfolio data, not arbitrary thresholds. The benchmark deepens with every scan.
Automated. Repeatable. Scalable across any portfolio size. The same system that produced this report can scan every entity in your portfolio weekly and flag changes as they happen. The methodology corrects for query bias, a problem we identified during this analysis that skews citation results by up to 50% depending on how queries are structured.
That is the conversation worth having.